Search for: "ROBERTS v. HUMPHREYS" Results 21 - 40 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
Loewy’s article The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent is cited in the following article: William Hopchak, Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:12 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  After the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in All American Check Cashing, the Fifth Circuit granted the petition for en banc review in Collins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
Francisco acknowledged that the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Ninth Circuit found that the structure of the CFPB did not violate the separation of powers, concluding that the Supreme Court’s separation-of-powers decisions, in particular Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:11 am by Robert Margolis
Robert Margolis“Reverse trademark confusion” infringement theory suffices for liability but does not support recovery of infringer’s profits. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
We opted not to include Myers and Humphrey's Executor; Morrison covers those issues well. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Humphrey, which bars civil suits about convictions that have not been reversed, expunged or declared invalid, count as “strikes” under the PLRA. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm by Robert Margolis
Robert MargolisMall operators had actual or constructive knowledge of tenants’ infringement, including prior law enforcement raids and eyewear maker Luxottica’s notifications of trademark infringement. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Robert Margolis
Robert MargolisA licensor’s failure to disclose in discovery an agreement acknowledging that a third party owned the mark was properly sanctioned. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:01 am by Robert Margolis
Robert MargolisDistrict court correctly held that trademark owner failed to raise genuine factual issue as to secondary meaning of the asserted mark. [read post]