Search for: "ROBERTS v. HUMPHREYS" Results 101 - 120 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am by Robert Brammer
This post was co-authored by Barbara Bavis and Robert Brammer, Legal Reference Librarians. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Employee Theft of Trade Secrets or Confidential Information in The Name of Protected Whistleblowing In our second webinar of the series, Seyfarth partner Robert Milligan answered the question, “Can employees steal trade secrets and confidential information to support their whistleblower claims? [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Employee Theft of Trade Secrets or Confidential Information in The Name of Protected Whistleblowing In our second webinar of the series, Seyfarth partner Robert Milligan answered the question, “Can employees steal trade secrets and confidential information to support their whistleblower claims? [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:43 am by Douglas
Os que vêem as coisas de forma diferente. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Humphreys School of Law) has posted The Great and Powerful Oz Revealed: The Ethics and Wisdom of the Scotus Leaks in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Edward Rubin
U.S., 272 U.S. 52 (1926) and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
In its landmark 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:18 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Chief Justice Roberts in a 5-4 decision (conservatives v. liberals), declared as unconstitutional the "dual for-cause limitations on the removal of [PCAOB] Board members". [read post]