Search for: "ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES" Results 221 - 240 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States and “resolve the longstanding circuit split on the meaning of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the federal unauthorized access statute. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm by Orin Kerr
Officers can search anything on the person incident to arrest — letters, booklets, wallets, crumpled packages, and the like — under United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
" This Court has acknowledged that "state constitutional and statutory law is subordinate to … 'the [United States] Constitution[.]'" Accordingly, the unborn plaintiffs fail to assert a legally cognizable and protected interest as persons pursuant to these repealed statutes, which are contrary to the United States Constitution as construed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:17 am
Tenth Circuit Courtroom.jpg Majority holds the trial court's denial of access to confidential informant's mental health records violated the Due Process Clause and restrictions on cross-examination violated the Confrontation Clause, in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:25 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Employment Comm'n, 754 S.W.2d 149, 151 (Tex. 1988); Robinson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
The parties to the lawsuit had sold a database, which collected police reports from across the United States, to LexisNexis. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm by Howard Friedman
Nichols & John Witte, Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State (National Report for United States of America), (Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State: Legal Pluralism from a Comparative Perspective, Ed. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:48 pm by Steven G. Pearl
., yesterday asked the Supreme Court of the United States to review the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in Dukes v. [read post]