Search for: "ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES" Results 221 - 240 of 1,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am by Rob Robinson
Logistic Regression: A state-of-the-art supervised learning algorithm for machine learning that estimates the probability that a document is relevant, based on the features that it contai [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices ruled that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force, for this blog. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Robinson, assistant professor at the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at the University of South Carolina:In the years following the landmark United States Supreme Court decision on libel law in New York Times v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson takes a look at the potential impact on state courts if the Supreme Court applied the Bill of Rights to the states as completely as some justices discussed during the oral argument last week in Timbs v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:49 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
 Our friends the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution deal with unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  In A v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that ‘the broader an [MP’s] immunity, the more compelling must be its justification in order that it can be said to be compatible with the Convention’ ([78]). [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Miriam Siefert analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]