Search for: "ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES" Results 421 - 440 of 944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm by Cindy Cohn and Hanni Fakhoury
While your phone’s capabilities are distinctly modern, a new decision in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state – provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am by Steven Eversole
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s recent announcement that she will speak next February at the Virginia Military Institute, the formerly all-male academy forced to admit women under Ginsburg’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:49 am by Robinson Law, PLLC
As we have noted on our blog in the past, the Commonwealth of Virginia is known for having some of the strictest DWI and DUI laws in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 3:03 am by Robinson Law, PLLC
The Commonwealth of Virginia is known for having some of the strictest DWI and DUI laws in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jon Robinson
  Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am by Paul Cassell
The United States filed an amicus brief making this point, skillfully reciting the history of prosecutions for threatening communications. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:17 pm
"Section 1983 supplies a cause of action to a plaintiff when a person acting under the color of state law deprives that plaintiff of any ‘rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States.' " Bruneau, 163 F.3d at 756 (citing 42 U.S.C. [read post]