Search for: "ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES" Results 461 - 480 of 1,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  First of all, the Third Circuit made clear in its en banc decision in Dunn v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
  United States law uses the exclusionary ruleto enforce the requirements of the 4th Amendment, which means evidence obtained by actions that violate the 4th Amendment cannot be used against the person whose property was searched in a criminal prosecution unless. . . . [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:50 am by Cody Poplin
-Israel relations as the Israeli government “has largely dismissed diplomatic efforts by the United States to end the violence in Gaza. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor and related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anorand related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anorand related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am by Jeremy
This issue that has been debated by copyright experts over the years because, it is argued, the destruction of an artwork may or may not have a negative impact on the reputation of the artist – the test established by Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, and mirrored in most copyright laws in the world, for claiming a violation of the artist’s right of integrity (in the context of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India, I commented: “destruction of a work can prejudice an… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by Jeremy Malcolm
In the United States, such a mashup would fall squarely within the scope of the fair use right. [read post]