Search for: "ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES" Results 721 - 740 of 949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm by Christine Dowling
Disparity in Federal Sentencing:  Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm by Orin Kerr
Officers can search anything on the person incident to arrest — letters, booklets, wallets, crumpled packages, and the like — under United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:15 am
Robinson, 47 Cal.4th 1104, 1133-1135, cert. denied, 131 S.Ct. 72 (2010) (arrest warrant for thirteen-loci DNA profile, which also offered explanation that profile had random match probability essentially incapable of duplication in human population, complied with particularity requirements of Fourth Amendment to United States Constitution and California Constitution); State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:33 pm by Andrew Russell
Thus, the method is not practiced "within the United States" as required by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:54 am by Kent Scheidegger
Corcoran, noted here, are relisted again, but United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1986), quoting 1 Robinson on Patents 532 (1890); Coleman v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm by Andrew Russell
Sept. 30, 2010), Judge Robinson granted a motion to dismiss contesting proper jurisdiction and venue, but only "to the extent that the present action shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
But it’s not a good thing that no foreign-born person can be president of the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]