Search for: "ROGERS v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 3,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
 Further, ALJ Rogers declined to allow Sidergas the opportunity to amend its response stating that if Sidergas wished to do so, it must file a motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(2). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Jeanne Charn
A simple approach is state provided counsel for all parties but this would impose on states costs of assistance for many who are well above typical legal aid guidelines (125% of poverty). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford On Monday, October 24, I’ll be participating in a panel discussion at NYU on the The Implications of Chevron v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Drape Creative, 909 F.3d 257 (9th Cir. 2018), the Honey Badger case, the Ninth Circuit began a process that could make Rogers v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:30 am by Eric Schweibenz
  ALJ Rogers further determined that Wistron’s four paragraph pleading did not meet the enhanced pleading standard required by Exergen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 am by Alex Gasser
  ALJ Rogers further denied, as unnecessary, APM’s request that any order granting HP’s motion include a statement clarifying that APM is not precluded from challenging the validity of these five patents in district court, in view of caselaw stating: “decisions of the ITC involving patent issues have no preclusive effect in other forums,” citing Texas Instruments Inc. v. [read post]