Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:57 am
United States, 883 F.2d 93, 97 (D.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 12:02 pm
Finally, in Ross v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 7:10 pm
If true, the United States would have surely noted this risk in its amicus brief. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:29 pm
In Lehman v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm
From Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:34 am
Customs and Border Protection, blood plasma companies challenged an alleged change in CBP policy that resulted in Mexican plasma donors being denied entrance to the United States using B-1 business visitor visas. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:51 pm
United States 21-1352Issue: Whether plain-error review governs claims on appeal of error under Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm
But because such states are unlikely to pay, Congress passed the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (the “Act”), which established a fund to compensate terrorism victims. [read post]
