Search for: "RUNNELS v. STATE"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 10:16 am
Under AEDPA, the 9th finds that the state's holding was not unreasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
Newell, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
Runnels, 2009 U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
” The court, however, rapidly rejected this argument, noting that the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:36 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
E-mail: yvonne@tdoa.state.tx.us Texas Department on Aging 4900 North Lamar, 4th Floor Austin, TX 78751-2316 Phone: (512)424-6840; (800) 252-9240 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.tdoa.state.tx.us/index.htm AARP Texas 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 750 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 480-9797 Fax: (512) 480-9799 Web: http://www.aarp.org/states/tx ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX… [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:34 am
Her arguments seem fairly weak, and especially in places, a fair piece of a results-oriented stretch to find as many procedural obstacles to relief as possible.Admittedly, Judge Ikuta does a decent job at the end of her dissent of making her position seem somewhat moderate, stating that "[a]ll this is not to say that the majority's view is unreasonable. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Runnels, No. 06-16780 (10-10-07). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
Runnels. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
State. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 9:55 am
Runnels, 2007 U.S. [read post]
