Search for: "RUNNELS v. STATE" Results 21 - 28 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 10:16 am by Jon Sands
Under AEDPA, the 9th finds that the state's holding was not unreasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:34 am
Her arguments seem fairly weak, and especially in places, a fair piece of a results-oriented stretch to find as many procedural obstacles to relief as possible.Admittedly, Judge Ikuta does a decent job at the end of her dissent of making her position seem somewhat moderate, stating that "[a]ll this is not to say that the majority's view is unreasonable. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Runnels, No. 06-16780 (10-10-07). [read post]