Search for: "Rachel v State" Results 1 - 20 of 711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2022, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Rachel Rein (Columbia University), Clear but Unconvincing: Revisiting Addington v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:51 am by Walter Olson
In 1987, Federal judge Christine Cook Nettesheim accurately characterized the initial 1973 asbestos case, Borel v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:25 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Rachel Paulose, who is a former United States Attorney. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
Hirshberg (University of Missouri) has recently published an article entitled, You Can't Have Your Trust and Defeat It Too: Why Mandatory Arbitration Provisions in Trusts Are Enforceable, and Why State Courts Are Getting It Wrong: Rachel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
Hirshberg (University of Missouri) has recently published an article entitled, You Can't Have Your Trust and Defeat It Too: Why Mandatory Arbitration Provisions in Trusts Are Enforceable, and Why State Courts Are Getting It Wrong: Rachel v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by Dan Markel
(Rachel asked to also thank UVA law librarian Kent Olson for his help with the underlying research). -- In light of the likely significance of the Court's opinion in Riley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 1:43 pm
Rachel Pickering and I recently filed a cert petition in State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Rachel Paulose, who is a former Senate Confirmed United States Attorney. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 6:03 am
Rachel Pickering and Jay Witt won in State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
  The Court granted certiorari to decide that question in United States v. [read post]