Search for: "Railroad Company v. Alabama" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am by Kevin Russell
Alabama Department of Revenue, No. 09-520, ruling in a railroad company’s favor in a dispute over fuel taxes in Alabama. [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:50 am by Gail Heriot
Today is the 122st anniversary of the decision in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:41 am by Tara Richard
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, 13-921, Judge Feldman, 9:00am Muth, Sr et al v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
In other words, should the railroad be compared to other commercial companies, many of which pay the 4% sales tax in Alabama? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. § 11501(b)(4). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
  In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. § 11501(b)(4). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by Lisa McElroy
The federal law says that states cannot tax rail carriers in a discriminatory way; Alabama’s tax on diesel fuel applies only to railroads and not other transportation companies that are the railroads’ main competitors.  [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Alabama Dep't of Revenue, No. 08-12712 Alabama's sales and use tax on diesel fuel, with its exemptions for motor and water carriers, does not discriminate against railroad companies in violation of Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Regal-Beloit Corporation Docket: 08-1553; 08-1554 (this case was consolidated with Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]