Search for: "Railroad Company v. Alabama" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 5:50 am by Gail Heriot
Today is the 122st anniversary of the decision in Plessy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
A further seven states unhelpfully said their answers cannot be relied upon as guidance by taxpayers (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Mexico). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
In other words, should the railroad be compared to other commercial companies, many of which pay the 4% sales tax in Alabama? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
May 14, 2007).Not only that, courts applying Alabama law have rejected market share liability, Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
  In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by Lisa McElroy
  The federal law says that states cannot tax rail carriers in a discriminatory way; Alabama’s tax on diesel fuel applies only to railroads and not other transportation companies that are the railroads’ main competitors. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am by Kevin Russell
Alabama Department of Revenue, No. 09-520, ruling in a railroad company’s favor in a dispute over fuel taxes in Alabama. [read post]