Search for: "Railroad Company v. Alabama"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
A further seven states unhelpfully said their answers cannot be relied upon as guidance by taxpayers (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Mexico). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Wagner v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
In other words, should the railroad be compared to other commercial companies, many of which pay the 4% sales tax in Alabama? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
May 14, 2007).Not only that, courts applying Alabama law have rejected market share liability, Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:14 pm
The case is Federal Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
The federal law says that states cannot tax rail carriers in a discriminatory way; Alabama’s tax on diesel fuel applies only to railroads and not other transportation companies that are the railroads’ main competitors. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, No. 09-520, ruling in a railroad company’s favor in a dispute over fuel taxes in Alabama. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
The case is CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Abel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Mich. 2000), the bankruptcy court rejected market share liability in the context of breast implants where the federal government invoked the theory in an attempt to recover Medicare reimbursement.AlabamaMarket share liability has been rejected under Alabama law in the asbestos context. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
