Search for: "Railroad Company v. Alabama" Results 41 - 51 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
Mich. 2000), the bankruptcy court rejected market share liability in the context of breast implants where the federal government invoked the theory in an attempt to recover Medicare reimbursement.AlabamaMarket share liability has been rejected under Alabama law in the asbestos context. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Canada has an complicated relationship with American slavery, being one of the final destinations of the Underground Railroad. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Regal-Beloit Corporation Docket: 08-1553; 08-1554 (this case was consolidated with Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 50 S.W.3d 226, 249 (Mo. 2001); Lopez v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Alabama Dep't of Revenue, No. 08-12712 Alabama's sales and use tax on diesel fuel, with its exemptions for motor and water carriers, does not discriminate against railroad companies in violation of Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976. [read post]