Search for: "Railroad Company v. Commissioners" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 1:13 pm
" It will be interesting to see whether the Commissioners of the Texas Railroad Commission act on Commissioner Patterson's request. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
We are addressing the ongoing litigation between CSX, the railroad company, and a number of hedge funds, including The Children's Investment Fund and 3G Capital Partners. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:10 am by John McFarland
The case is Railroad Commission of Texas and Pioneer Exploration, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by John R. Phillips
Kokesh’s (“Kokesh”) misappropriation of funds from four SEC-registered business development companies (“BDC”). [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:02 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The plaintiff in Hartney resells fuel oil to railroads, trucking companies, gas stations and other fuel distributors. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  A similar regime, though more flexible, is a foundation of limited liability companies. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
Regal-Beloit Corporation; Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 4:45 am by Isreal Miller
The Texas Railroad Commission had originally sued Timber Creek Oil Company and Mr. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:35 am by Paul J. Feldman
That meant that they were regulated as “common carriers”, i.e., much like railroads and other monopolies as far back as the 19th century. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
High Point, Thomasville and Denton Railroad Company, 142 F. 3d 769 (1998)), the panel majority agreed that Consol failed to show that Georgia Power Company acted with the necessary intent to create “arranger” liability for itself. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Regal-Beloit Corporation Docket: 08-1553; 08-1554 (this case was consolidated with Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]