Search for: "Railroad Company v. Grant" Results 21 - 40 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
ELSSCAP also had a cert grant and a 9-0 win recently in Bullock v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Regal-Beloit (08-1553) and Union Pacific Railroad v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:29 pm by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court recently granted a petition for review in the case of Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am by Andrew Alberg
A few months before the law was repealed, the Government granted an 83-acre parcel of land in Wyoming to Melvin and Lulu Brandt in fee simple, with an exception for rights granted to a certain railroad company under the Act of 1875. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm by Sme
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and DiseaseBNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The federal government  encouraged that process by giving rail companies a form of subsidy through a grant of rights-of-way on government-owned lands for railroad beds. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-604 Title: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court supporting their position: Granting a tax exemption, or a zero percent rate, to one company, can produce identical outcomes as a heavier tax on its competitors.... [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
BERNARD, DECEASED, AND FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 2:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
***As a footnote, Ross Winans, of fame in the 1853 Supreme Court Case Winans v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 4:49 pm
He sued Union Pacifc Railroad Company, the operator of the train, for negligence and for willful and wanton misconduct. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 10:00 pm by Michael Wolgin
The Fourth Circuit reversed and remanded the district court’s order granting Norfolk Southern Railway Company’s motion to confirm an arbitration award determining the amount Sprint must pay to Norfolk Southern for continued use of railroad rights. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  Ultimately, Judge Nealon granted the Railroad’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to one Plaintiff based upon the federal version of the “discovery rule. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Today the Supreme Court decided an interesting patent case in Brandt v. [read post]