Search for: "Railroad Company v. Maine" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 2:11 pm by Steve Clowney
Maine Central Railroad Company: Lessons from the 'Maine Rule' for Adverse Possession (Hofstra Law Review) on SSRN. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Maine Central Railroad Company: Lessons from the “Maine Rule” for Adverse Possession, which is forthcoming in the Hofstra Law ReviewUnder the “Maine Rule” for adverse possession, only possessors having the requisite intent can perfect an adverse possession claim. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm by WIMS
Petitioners Alaska Survival, Sierra Club, and Cook Inletkeeper seek review of the Surface Transportation Board's (STB) decision authorizing Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) to construct about thirty-five miles of new rail line between Port MacKenzie, located in Alaska's Cook Inlet, and the railroad's main line, located near Wasilla, Alaska. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:17 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
General Mills hired CSX to construct a private “sidetrack” connecting its plant with CSX’s main railroad line. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States, United States Supreme Court (3/10/14)Real Estate & Property Law, Transportation Law, Zoning, Planning & Land UseThe General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875 provides railroad companies “right[s] of way through the public lands of the United States,” 43 U.S.C. 934. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
Palsgraf would not have been injured but for the acts of the railroad company's employees. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
The name of Dwight Opperman will be familiar to older members of the Slaw community – he was the former head of the West Publishing Company, who presided over the sale of the premier US legal publishing company to Thomson. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm by Brian J. Bergman
   On appeal, the main issue for the 9th circuit was whether the Railroad companies, as mere operators of the french drain, should be held responsible for the spread of the petroleum contamination through the french drain. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:51 am by Sean Hayes
Article 8 (Articles of Incorporation) (1) Promoters of a real estate investment company shall prepare the articles of incorporation including the matters of the following subparagraphs, and put their names and seals or signatures thereon: 1.Purpose; 2.Company name; 3.Total number of stocks to be issued; 4.Price of a stock; 5.Total number of stocks to be issued at the time of establishment; 6.Matters relating to the investment and management of assets; 7.Matters relating to the… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Section 230 was enacted as a response to Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
  The main issue for the court in Koprivec would be: 1) whether or not Copps Chapel was still good law in Ohio; and 2) if not, what new “magic words” in Ohio would be required to create a fee simple determinable.Background/Facts of Koprivec v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
  The main issue for the court in Koprivec would be: 1) whether or not Copps Chapel was still good law in Ohio; and 2) if not, what new “magic words” in Ohio would be required to create a fee simple determinable.Background/Facts of Koprivec v. [read post]