Search for: "Railroad Company v. Rose" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
Rose is a straightforward one:  certiorari should be denied. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Carol Rose has a great article explaining why she thinks this isn’t accurate.) [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:20 am by Kevin Goldberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has vacated an intern-friendly decision in Glatt v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Judge John Howard Ferguson ignored federal law and ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]