Search for: "Railroad Company v. Tennessee"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
Canadian National Railway/Illinois Central Railroad Company, a case set to be reconsidered by the DOL. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
A Louisiana state law mandated that railroad companies were to have separate cars for black and white passengers. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 10:36 am
In another case, a federal court in New York found a railroad station employee’s claim supported by evidence that, after he took leave for a heart condition, he was disciplined and placed in an extremely hot booth with an inoperable air conditioning unit that the employer declined to fix (McAllister v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:56 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
High Point, Thomasville and Denton Railroad Company, 142 F. 3d 769 (1998)), the panel majority agreed that Consol failed to show that Georgia Power Company acted with the necessary intent to create “arranger” liability for itself. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm
Walters, a railroad company challenged the constitutionality of a Tennessee law that imposed various costs related to railway crossings, and the trial court engaged in extensive fact-finding before striking down the statute as irrational. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Luminant Generation Company LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Solo v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
AFTRA is an important voice for artists on Capitol Hill and helps artists to exercise their fundamental Constitutional right of association (Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
http://j.st/pDR Barton v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
In other words, the defendants contend that railroad companies do not have a duty to ensure that railroad crossings provide a reasonable degree of visibility to motorists. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
This is one of a series of posts that will excerpt sections from the third edition of my book, Day on Torts: Leading Tennessee Tort Cases. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Docket: 09-1255Issue(s): Whether the federally funded addition of a component of a warning device (retroreflective tape) to an existing warning device (a crossbuck warning sign) at a railroad crossing is the installation of a “warning device” under 23 C.F.R. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
In addition, companies feel strongly (and justifiably so) that an applicant who is in serious, personal financial difficulty might be prone to misappropriate company funds put under their control. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Sheffield v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Ferrell v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Under the settlement, the railroad will pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, which included the discharge of tons of chlorine from a derailed train tank car and thousands of gallons of diesel fuel from ruptured locomotive engine fuel tanks. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Disivion) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Association of American Railroads Title: Zagorski v. [read post]
