Search for: "Railway Company v. Alling" Results 1 - 20 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2009, 1:27 am
On January 27, 2009, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal held that the Federal Railway Labor Act does not preempt a putative class action law suit against an airline company for willfully failing to pay former employees all wages due upon termination pursuant to Oregon law. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v BNSF Railway Company (W.D. [read post]
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, 266 A.3d 542 (Pa. 2021), in which the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the increasingly contentious “consent-by-registration” theory of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding no clear error in a magistrate judge’s ruling that it would exceed the scope of Rule 34 to require a railway company to allow the EEOC and an intervening plaintiff to record, onsite, the performance of all essential functions of a job for which the plaintiff was rejected due to a hand impairment and to question current employees performing such tasks in “roving depositions,” a federal district court in Kansas denied a motion to review the… [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:07 am by Alex Loomis
Circuit removed a hurdle for a pending suit against the Republic of Hungary and the Republic’s state-owned railway company. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
The Curia website brings us news of an appeal which has been lodged by Germany’s railway company Deutsche Bahn AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) in Case T-404/09 Deutsche Bahn AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).By way of background: Deutsche Bahn AG had filed a trade mark application for registration of a figurative mark that consisted of a horizontal combination of the colours grey and red and… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley… [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 11:28 am by Pierre Bergeron
  That’s the situation that the Sixth Circuit confronted in Cuyahoga Valley Railway Company v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am by Daniel Hemel
It wasn’t until the very end of her rebuttal time in BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]