Search for: "Rakes v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 7:37 am
If convicted, each Defendant faces  a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense.United States of America v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 2:36 pm by Viking
NMCCA has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:17 am by Ben
From 2013 to 2015 alone, there has been a 50% increase in unauthorized stream-ripping in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Richard Painter
   Perhaps we should say that the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois and the United States government had no duty, and indeed no right, to protect her children from gun violence after they were born. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:13 am
United States, 458 F.3d 1345, 1352 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:08 pm
Despite the fact that class action status is a necessary tool which is provided to plaintiffs in the laws of the United States, the Supreme Court has recently displayed a pattern of ruling against class actions. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state – provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am by Steven Eversole
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“BDI”) appeals from a finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York holding BDI’s asserteddesign patent invalid on summary judgment and alsodismissing BDI’s trade dress claims with prejudice. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:32 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]