Search for: "Ramirez v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Robert Icenhauer-Ramirez, an attorney holding a doctorate in history from the University of Texas, Austin, has published Treason on Trial: The United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am by Michael DelSignore
If the victim does not wish to testify the government will attempt to admit the 911 calls into evidence, pursuant to case law from the United States Supreme Court, that that allows statements made to a 911 operator to come into evidence without the defendant being given the opportunity to cross-examine the victim under a case known as Davis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Paul Ramirez (NU)• Evelyn Atkinson (University of Chicago), "The Right to Bodily Integrity: Pratt v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Ramirez (2004) -- sufficiency of non-particularized search warrant Grutter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
Ramirez (2004) -- sufficiency of non-particularized search warrantGrutter v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm by Christine Dowling
  For instance last week, Alito authored the majority opinion in Davis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the denial of certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot in back… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8996, Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Ramirez (2004) -- Fourth Amendment sufficiency of non-particularized search warrantGrutter v. [read post]