Search for: "Ramos v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
The first challenge to a photo ID law to reach the Supreme Court—Crawford v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
In February 2014, we reported on the Second Circuit’s request for direction from the New York Court of Appeals as to two questions arising out of Ramos v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm
But I do not think that it stands with regards to the other variants that we will be exploring -- namely the experimental variant (aka 'Beijing Consensus v.2') and the state-capitalist variant (aka 'Beijing Consensus v.3'). [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:41 am
Just before 9:00 PM EST, District Court Judge Ramos, in Veasey v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm
That is a principle the Court appeared to establish in a late October 2006 decision, Purcell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
Ramos Vega 2. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am
However, “it might also be safely said that the occasional easy case makes law that is even worse” (People v Ramos, 40 NY2d 610, 628 [1976] [Jasen, dissenting]). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Ramos-Vega, and Liza L. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff can sue these fellas under Section 1983.The case is Gleason v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:53 am
State v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
The District Court (Edgardo Ramos, Judge) ruled that Sherman’s claim under the Takings Clause was not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
The District Court (Edgardo Ramos, Judge) ruled that Sherman’s claim under the Takings Clause was not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:02 pm
Additionally, nowhere in the record did the defendant explicitly state that he waived his right to appeal. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
Miller (racial harassment)Ramos v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:45 am
Here are the materials in Ramos v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
