Search for: "Ramos v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
There is no way to know how the court’s other members voted, but two years ago Justice Elena Kagan joined Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent from the court’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Contract Law Contract Drafting California Law     APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy B. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Ramos the Appellate Division held that an employee serving a disciplinary probationary period may be terminated without a hearing for violating the terms of the disciplinary probation.In contrast, in Taylor v Cass, 122 AD2d 885, an employee won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after the court determined that the employee had been improperly dismissed while serving a "disciplinary probation. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Sánchez Ramos, 173 DPR 389, (2008), el Tribunal anuló citaciones de una comisión de la Cámara de Representantes a los Secretarios de Justicia y Familia. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Post-Stulman, every other court to have considered this issue has agreed with Justice Ramos. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
On April 24, 2017, Law Firm filed two complaints on behalf of NCSLT 2006-3 against Douglass in King County Superior Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Ramos, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York, New York, for plaintiffs-appellees. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:24 am
She then traced case law dating back to Pushpanathan v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
The Appellate Division sustained her termination without a hearing, finding that Ramos had violated the terms of her disciplinary probation (Ramos v Coombs, App Div, 237 AD2d 713).NYPPL [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:35 pm by Peter Vodola
  In particular, the appellate judges said that the opinion of a later judge that a court-approved transfer did not meet the SSPA requirements was not "sufficient grounds for a superior court judge to void the final order of another superior court judge. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]