Search for: "Rand v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In its brief, United Policyholders stated that the D&O insurer’s “interpretation of the subject exclusion renders paid-for coverage illusory. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This afternoon, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from investigations “related in any way to the campaigns for president of the United States. [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States],” and he urges Kavanaugh to “say so publicly during his Senate confirmation hearings. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am by William Ford
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
Rand Paul in late April—but never formally introduced—would have operated similarly but would have provided expedited procedures through which any individual senator could force a vote on a motion to allow remote voting for up to 30 days, provided that three-fourths of the Senate voted in favor. [read post]