Search for: "Rand v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
At the Supreme Court of Canada, the covenant was found to be invalid, as not running with the land and as a restraint on alienation; in part because it was not possible “to set such limits to the lines of race or blood as would enable a court to say in all cases whether a proposed purchaser is or is not within the ban” and was thus void for uncertainty (Rand J., Noble v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
There are the usual exemptions, as well as others not usually specified, including people just passing through the province to elsewhere, although they must stop only for necessary reasons (also see a similar provision for people transiting through the NWT to Nunavut for less than 12 hours and for non Yukon residents travelling to a neighbouring jurisdiction, allowed a maximum 24 hours), “a family unit of parents and children, to facilitate shared custody of children as per a court… [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
Rand Paul in late April—but never formally introduced—would have operated similarly but would have provided expedited procedures through which any individual senator could force a vote on a motion to allow remote voting for up to 30 days, provided that three-fourths of the Senate voted in favor. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
It draws its authority from the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which granted the Attorney General power to direct federal agencies to collect DNA from “individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted or from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:20 pm
Description of techniques carried out before targeting United States person. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
United States decision by the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
In 1959, Rand J. famously described in Roncarelli v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm
United States (2012), the Supreme Court rejected the Obama administration's dubious argument that temporary flooding of property by the government can never qualify as a taking. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:24 pm
Rand Paul (R-Ky.). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
”); United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Lawson is a libertarian devotee of Ayn Rand, who, to be sure, figures in Kersch's book. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am
Yesterday evening the United States Department of Justice filed a statement in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
The paper describes threshold rescissions, which limit participation based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, restrict the ability to work legally and remain in the United States or adversely affect representation in the political system. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
While the humanitarian crisis in Yemen has been the subject of widespread bipartisan concern within Congress, there is disagreement on what steps the United States should take to address the situation. [read post]
