Search for: "Rand v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 6:37 am
At that time, it was calculated, the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) would only have enough money to fund 81 percent of the total needed. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 6:55 am
There were those who felt the federal disability program should not be administrated by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) as they were seen as an unnecessary middleman. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:54 am
Senator Rand Paul was one of the biggest proponents of this theory. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:53 am
Mostly, it is the GOP hopefuls who are intent on overhauling the United States Social Security Administration (SSA), and in some cases even shutting down the entire agency and privatizing the disability benefits system in the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:05 am
Colvin, November 6, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit More Blog Entries: Rand Paul Says Many Receiving SSDI Benefits Gaming System, Jan. 27, 2015, Boston Social Security Disability Insurance Lawyer Blog The post Lesterhuis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
But here are a few titles you might not expect to see on a “banned books” list: Sketching Basics Batman: Eye of the Beholder Rand McNally Family World Atlas E=MC2: Simple Physics Acupressure for Emotional Healing Arizona Wildlife Views The Onion Book of Known Knowledge Merck Manual of Medical Information: Home Edition Mythology of Greece and Rome Dragonology: The Complete Book of Dragons For an interactive infographic featuring classic books once banned inside the… [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
Additional Resources: Rand Paul’s Social Security Falsehoods Are a Disservice to the Country, September 25, 2015, Huffington Post, by Alex Lawson More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
As I explained in an earlier Verdict column, under the most natural reading of both the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the leading case construing it—the 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
The Amendment’s text reads:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.This powerful piece of constitutional text has ensured for 150 years that whatever else happens to people at the bottom rungs of American society, whose own legal status in our polity may be doubtful, their children, at least, are full legal citizens of the… [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am
A big case was argued this week before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
Related Issues: Computer Fraud And Abuse Act ReformRelated Cases: United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Rand Paul, M.D., who most certainly should know better. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
ObamaKlayman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
In the 1996 case of Whren v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
Or both.United States v. [read post]
