Search for: "Rank v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 3,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:45 am by Keegan McBride
Politically, it was considered a “second-rank middle power” that was consistently unable to deliver. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Peter Rawlings
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, via summary order, vacated a district court’s grant of Starbucks’s request to serve wide-ranging subpoenas on its rank-and-file employees in a 10(j) proceeding, a decision that may augur how appellate courts will view the emerging employer practice of seeking extensive rank-and-file state-of-mind discovery in future temporary injunction actions by the Government.In Leslie v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  It's sobering that of all the times they could have discovered free-speech maximalism – and should have owned the hypocrisy –  they've done so now to protect rank antisemitism. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Regarding the principle of equivalence, the ECJ reiterated that Article 6(1) UCTD ranks equally with domestic rules of public policy. [read post]