Search for: "Rank v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 3:12 am
Kieran Buckley (Opinion, United States Supreme Court, No. 21-908, ... [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ali v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:36 pm
Wirth v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
"The Pena court, citing City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768, said that only if Pena’s challenge to the list itself was successful would she have a remedy that comports with Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution, in that the original list would have had no legal existence and thus could not have expired, allowing for extension of a 'corrected' list. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
The current act is before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
” Wieder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:28 pm
Representing the states, New York City and the land trusts at tomorrow’s arguments will be New York state Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, a veteran Supreme Court advocate who served as a high-ranking official within USDOJ’s Solicitor General’s Office during the Clinton Administration. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
" Prowire LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:18 am
This case will involve the review of Iqbal v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:32 am
If you missed RealityCheck’s interview last night with Colonel Sullivan, retired CDR Phil Cave (whose rank I inadvertently omitted in previous posts — mea culpa), and Fogbow blogger Mata Mari, you can still find it online here: blogtalkradio. 0945: Update from the colonel: the defense rested without presenting any evidence. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
Inside Higher Ed, Academic Performance and the BCS, by John V. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
On February 9, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey decided the case of Martin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:25 am
Per Burgess v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
The Republican Party almost immediately closed ranks in the first two Obamacare suits: NFIB v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:00 am
Whilst separate consideration of the children’s best interests is required, and this must rank as a primary consideration, in this case the appellant had no relationship with his children. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:41 pm
Wired: “…People have claimed that this week’s leak of Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
Giving the leading judgment Lord Carnwath stated that the question was how the element of chance was provided “in the game”. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:39 pm
We are happy to report that the Department of State has released an important announcement that describes the agency’s compliance with the recent court ruling, Gomez v. [read post]
