Search for: "Rankin v. McPherson" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 3:16 am
Citing Rankin v McPherson, 483 US 378, the Circuit Court said that "[a]lthough it is well-established that an employer may not discharge a public employee in retaliation for the employee's exercise of his right to freedom of speech, that right is not absolute. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Where its employee speaks on matters of public concern, the government bears the burden of justifying any adverse employment action [Rankin v McPherson, 483 US 378].It was undisputed that many federal and state laws require ACS and HRA records, reports, and information relating to specific children or families, be kept confidential. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:18 am by SHG
Raymond Wayne Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) and Rankin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am by SHG
See, e. g., Pickering, supra, at 568; Connick, supra, at 147; Rankin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by SHG
, Pickering, supra,at 568; Connick, supra, at 147; Rankin v. [read post]