Search for: "Rantanen"
Results 281 - 300
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2013, 7:00 pm
By Jason RantanenIn December, the Federal Circuit denied a request for rehearing en banc in Highmark v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:06 am
By Jason Rantanen Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:11 pm
By Jason Rantanen There are two terrific-looking conferences coming up in Chicago in early April. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:41 am
By Jason Rantanen For those who aren't familiar with The Sedona Conference, it's a law and policy think tank that organizes programs that bring together judges, lawyers, experts and academics to discuss issues in antitrust law, intellectual property, and other forms of complex litigation. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:08 pm
By Jason RantanenIn a per curium order issued a short time ago, the current sitting judges of the Federal Circuit (Chief Judge Rader and Judges Newman, Lourie, Dyk, Prost, Moore, O'Malley, Reyna, and Wallach) have granted Lighting Ballast Control's petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
By Jason Rantanen Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Limited v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:23 am
DiCola (see my last most-downloaded post for links)The Federal Circuit's New Obviousness Jurisprudence: An Empirical Study, by Jason Rantanen (Jason posted about this on Patently-O)Orphan Works and the Search for Rightsholders: Who Participates in a 'Diligent Search' under Present and Proposed Regimes? [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:10 pm
By Jason Rantanen SMU Dedman School of Law 10th Annual Symposium on Emerging Intellectual Property Issues On Friday, March 22, the SMU Dedman School of Law will be hosting its 10th Annual Symposium on Emerging Intellectual Property Issues in Dallas, Texas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
By Jason Rantanen One of the ongoing debates involving the Federal Circuit revolves around its performance as a circuit court. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:26 am
By Jason Rantanen Read the opinion here: Gunn v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:50 pm
As Prof Rantanen discussed yesterday, Mark Lemley has proposed that the court should begin interpreting functionally claimed elements as also being bound by 112(f). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:06 pm
By Jason Rantanen Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:36 pm
by Jason Rantanen Arkema v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:24 pm
By Jason Rantanen [Download the draft article] Obviousness remains one of the primary issues raised in patent cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
By Jason Rantanen Rexnord Industries, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 11:16 am
By Jason Rantanen Allflex USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:49 pm
By Jason Rantanen The C.W. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:17 pm
By Jason Rantanen Each year the Federal Circuit provides caseload statistics. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation (Fed. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:06 am
By Jason Rantanen Following up on Dennis's post earlier this morning, below I've provided a few charts showing the Federal Circuit's practice of citing KSR in its obviousness opinions. [read post]