Search for: "Rantanen" Results 281 - 300 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2013, 7:00 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason RantanenIn December, the Federal Circuit denied a request for rehearing en banc in Highmark v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:11 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen There are two terrific-looking conferences coming up in Chicago in early April. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:41 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen For those who aren't familiar with The Sedona Conference, it's a law and policy think tank that organizes programs that bring together judges, lawyers, experts and academics to discuss issues in antitrust law, intellectual property, and other forms of complex litigation. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason RantanenIn a per curium order issued a short time ago, the current sitting judges of the Federal Circuit (Chief Judge Rader and Judges Newman, Lourie, Dyk, Prost, Moore, O'Malley, Reyna, and Wallach) have granted Lighting Ballast Control's petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:00 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Limited v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:23 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
DiCola (see my last most-downloaded post for links)The Federal Circuit's New Obviousness Jurisprudence: An Empirical Study, by Jason Rantanen (Jason posted about this on Patently-O)Orphan Works and the Search for Rightsholders: Who Participates in a 'Diligent Search' under Present and Proposed Regimes? [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:10 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen SMU Dedman School of Law 10th Annual Symposium on Emerging Intellectual Property Issues On Friday, March 22, the SMU Dedman School of Law will be hosting its 10th Annual Symposium on Emerging Intellectual Property Issues in Dallas, Texas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 10:11 am by Rantanen
 By Jason Rantanen One of the ongoing debates involving the Federal Circuit revolves around its performance as a circuit court. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  As Prof Rantanen discussed yesterday, Mark Lemley has proposed that the court should begin interpreting functionally claimed elements as also being bound by 112(f). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:24 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen [Download the draft article] Obviousness remains one of the primary issues raised in patent cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Rexnord Industries, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:49 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen The C.W. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:17 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Each year the Federal Circuit provides caseload statistics. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation (Fed. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:06 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Following up on Dennis's post earlier this morning, below I've provided a few charts showing the Federal Circuit's practice of citing KSR in its obviousness opinions. [read post]