Search for: "Rantanen"
Results 21 - 40
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 6:11 am
This process was greatly aided by Jason Rantanen’s Federal Circuit Document Dataset that he makes publicly available. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:29 am
Rantanen’s work available here: Jason Rantanen, “Federal Circuit Docket Dataset”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EKSYHL, Harvard Dataverse, V3 (2021). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm
Matthews, Abigail and Rantanen, Jason, Legal Research as a Collective Enterprise: An Examination of Data Availability in Empirical Legal Scholarship (March 14, 2022). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:26 pm
By Jason Rantanen Spring 2022 is roaring forward – and this semester is an especially busy one for me. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:02 am
Jason Rantanen, The PTAB, The Director, and The Federal Circuit. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Murphy’s book Administrative Law and Practice is cited in the following article: Jason Rantanen & Madison Murhammer Colon, Can Public Universities Patent Their Research? [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:00 pm
By Jason Rantanen Happy 2022! [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 3:31 pm
Rantanen, Jason, Missing Decisions and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (September 20, 2021). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:53 am
By Jason Rantanen This Friday, November 5, the Iowa Innovation, Business & Law Center will be hosting a first-of-its-kind event (to the best of my knowledge at least): a panel discussion by patent law casebook authors about what makes their textbooks tick. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 9:07 am
But as we, along with Jason Rantanen, discussed in a series of recent posts, the Federal Circuit has begun to push back, repeatedly using the extraordinary writ of mandamus to overturn decisions by Judge Albright denying transfer under § 1404(a). [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the final post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the second post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
By Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, and Jason Rantanen This is the first post in a series about our new research project on mandamus practice in the federal courts of appeals generally and the Federal Circuit’s peculiar use of mandamus in patent cases specifically. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 8:24 am
By Jason Rantanen In re ESIP (Panel: O’Malley, Reyna, Chen) (link to decision: In re ESIP SERIES 2) This is a short nonprecedential decision in a petition for a writ of mandamus that was issued today but that isn’t on the Federal Circuit’s website. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
Jason Rantanen has written about missing appellate decisions, and mandamus decisions are right in the sweet-spot of decisions that potentially don’t find their way into Westlaw. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re: Juniper Networks (Panel: Judges Dyk, Prost, Hughes) By my count, it’s been over a month and a half since the Federal Circuit issued a decision granting a petition for writ of mandamus arising from the Western District of Texas. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:39 am
By Jason Rantanen Last week the Federal Circuit issued two interesting orders in appeals from the USPTO. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:54 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m getting ready to teach my Fall 2021 Patent Law class, and that means doing an updated patent grant graph. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Murphy’s book Administrative Law and Practice is cited in the following article: Jason Rantanen & Madison Murhammer Colon, Can Public Universities Patent their Research? [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:02 am
Sease who writes about “Court Decisions and Recent Legislation are Creating a “Perfect Storm” Incentive for Inventors to Rely on Trade Secrets, Not Patents” Sarah Hinchliffe, Associate Professor at Long Island University who writes about “Class 705 Business Methods Patents in the United States: A study from 1998 to 2010” Professor Jason Rantanen, University of Iowa College of Law and Director of the Iowa Innovation, Business & Law Center and Madison… [read post]
