Search for: "Rantanen"
Results 61 - 80
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
by Jason Rantanen Tomorrow, Monday April 18th, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Microsoft v. i4i, which presents the question whether proving invalidity requires clear and convincing evidence when the prior art on which the invaldity defense rests was not considered by the PTO. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
By Jason Rantanen Next Friday, October 2, the Iowa Intellectual Property Law Association will hold its annual conference. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Posted by Jason Rantanen There are many sophisticated and nuanced reasons to oppose H.R. 1249, the 140-page patent bill currently pending before the House of Representatives, but the clearest reason for opposition can be stated in quite simple and stark terms: The proposed legislation would undeniably expand the size of the federal bureaucracy and increase the cost and complexity of the American patent system. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:18 pm
By Jason Rantanen Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on one of the questions presented in Commil v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
By Jason Rantanen We’re now halfway through financial year 2016, and so far patent application and grant numbers are looking similar to the past few years. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:46 am
By Jason Rantanen As I mentioned a few weeks ago, next week The Sedona Conference will be presenting a major webinar entitled Patent Litigation Best Practices: A Matter for Congress or for Bench and Bar? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
By Jason Rantanen Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:26 am
By Jason Rantanen Read the opinion here: Gunn v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:45 pm
IPSC 2016 - Breakout Session III - IP, The Constitution, and the Courts Lexmark and the Holding Dicta Distinction – Andrew Michaels A Problem of Subject Matter: Patent Demand Letters and the Federal Circuit’s Jurisdiction – Charles Duan & Kerry Sheehan Established Rights, the Takings Clause, and Patent Law – Jason Rantanen A Free Speech Right to Trademark Protection? [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 12:29 pm
By Jason Rantanen ClearValue, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Google Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
By Jason Rantanen Dissenting opinions are generally considered to be good predictors of en banc review. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen Yesterday, the negotiating parties (which include the United States) released the final draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a document that purports to combat the proliferation of pirated and counterfeit goods. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:22 pm
By Jason Rantanen American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:55 am
By Jason Rantanen The conventional approach to the fault elements1 of indirect and willful infringement is to speak of them in mens rea (or state of mind, if you prefer) terms. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
Article. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:21 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Vistaprint Ltd. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:24 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Microsoft Corporation (Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm
By Jason Rantanen Tomorrow, February 23rd, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Global-Tech v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:06 am
By Jason Rantanen On Friday, October 3, I will be moderating a panel of three district court judges at the Iowa Intellectual Property Law Association annual conference. [read post]
