Search for: "Rantanen" Results 61 - 80 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2016, 8:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Jason Rantanen, Data on Federal Circuit Appeals and Decisions, PATENTLY-O (June 2, 2016). [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:48 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen A few months ago, I wrote that the Federal Circuit is now receiving more appeals arising from the Patent and Trademark Office than the District Courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  The itself brief cites Professor Rantanen’s 2015 essay for the proposition that the high damage is likely result in an “explosion of design patent assertions and lawsuits. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
My August article referenced a Patently-O article by Professor Rantanen that included an analysis of the Federal Circuit’s Apple v Samsung decision and its ramifications, suggesting that the section 289 damages provision could induce “an explosion of design patent assertions and lawsuits. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Rantanen, Jason, Empirical Analyses of Judicial Opinions: Methodology, Metrics and the Federal Circuit (May 3, 2016). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:38 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen We’re now halfway through financial year 2016, and so far patent application and grant numbers are looking similar to the past few years. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:01 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen In preparing for a talk on recent developments in patent law that I’m giving in a few days at the Salishan Patent Conference, I went back and reread Judge Dyk’s opinion concurring in the Federal Circuit’s denial of rehearing en banc in Sequenom v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:11 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Mag Aerospace Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Impression Products Samuel Ernst, Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta Jason Rantanen, En banc Federal Circuit affirms Mallinkrodt, notwithstanding Quanta Dennis Crouch, Lexmark and Disposability: Gumming Up the Market for Refills and Repairs Dennis Crouch, Lexmark v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:11 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen This morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the design patent remedies question in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2016) Professor Rantanen wrote about the 2013 Federal Circuit OWW v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Rantanen explained, although the holding is simple, the ten-member majority panel took 90+ pages to describe how its conclusions conform with 19th – 21st century Supreme Court precedent and why the patent laws should operate differently than the copyright regime in these cases. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:44 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Saurabh Vishnubhakat (Texas A&M), Arti Rai (Duke) and Jay Kesan (Illinois) recently released a draft of their empirical study of Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court Proceedings. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:59 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen I’m excited to report that my academic institution, the University of Iowa, is hiring an in-house intellectual property attorney. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Rantanen and Chris Seaman Professors Rantanen and Seaman take a statutory and historical approach in their argument that willfulness is the appropriate standard for determining whether damages should be enhanced. [read post]