Search for: "Rappaport v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Ilya Somin
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Earlier last year a Los Angeles Superior Court ordered the coffee companies to put cancer warnings on their beverages. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am by David Gans
 (The Supreme Court has said as much repeatedly.) [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:55 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the Superior Court's prohibition against the use of the "error in judgment" jury instruction in medical malpractice cases.The "error in judgment" jury instruction was previously utilized by trial court judges to advise jurors that physicians were not liable for their "errors in  judgment" when making medical decisions.With its decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court supported the Superior… [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Ilya Somin
Unlike some other originalists, who defend the theory because they claim it is the only feasible way to interpret legal texts, McGinnis and Rappaport argue that originalism is superior to living constitutionalism because it produces better consequences, in the form of legal rules that benefit more people over time. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:24 am
Grumbine, the Pennsylvania Superior Court found no impediment to retroactive application of the holding in Pringle v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:34 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The prior decision referenced in which this ruling was first handed down was the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]