Search for: "Rappaport v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
[The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
See, e.g., Jack Michael Beermann, Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron and the Anti-Innovation Supreme Court at 8 (March 9, 2023) (“This article also illustrates how the Court is doing a poor job providing clear instructions to lower courts and other government entities on how and in some cases even whether to apply its doctrines. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
Here's Ramsey: I was initially skeptical of the major questions doctrine (MQD), as deployed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Earlier last year a Los Angeles Superior Court ordered the coffee companies to put cancer warnings on their beverages. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
(The Supreme Court has said as much repeatedly.) [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:55 pm
, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the Superior Court's prohibition against the use of the "error in judgment" jury instruction in medical malpractice cases.The "error in judgment" jury instruction was previously utilized by trial court judges to advise jurors that physicians were not liable for their "errors in judgment" when making medical decisions.With its decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court supported the Superior… [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am
Unlike some other originalists, who defend the theory because they claim it is the only feasible way to interpret legal texts, McGinnis and Rappaport argue that originalism is superior to living constitutionalism because it produces better consequences, in the form of legal rules that benefit more people over time. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
Rappaport. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:24 am
Grumbine, the Pennsylvania Superior Court found no impediment to retroactive application of the holding in Pringle v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:34 am
The prior decision referenced in which this ruling was first handed down was the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
Rappaport, 131 N.J. [read post]
