Search for: "Rappaport v. U.s" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2014, 5:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities — both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent Amendments under Article V. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
Ramsey believes that it is, while Rappaport is skeptical. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am by Stephen Griffin
  If you reject these arguments but also think it’s implausible that Article V has handled the full load of legitimate constitutional change since 1789, you’re on the right path in my opinion. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:17 am by Walter Olson
Rozenshtein, Lawfare] Unanimous Supreme Court spanks Ninth Circuit for its attempt to use immigration-law case to bring up (admittedly interesting) issue that neither party had presented and was not necessary to resolve the dispute [Ilya Shapiro and Michael Collins on U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am by Harold O'Grady
In Originalism and the Good Constitution, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport argue that it ought to change in only one way: through the formal mechanisms set out in the Constitution’s own Article V. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Originalism Blog, Michael Rappaport analyzes the government’s cert. petition in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]