Search for: "Rasul v. Bush" Results 1 - 20 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
Bush, he said, affirms that Guantanamo detainees have a right of discovery to relevant exculpatory evidence, and federal courts have followed that precedent in habeas cases, including Duran v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:00 am by Quimbee
The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, but later, the United States Supreme Court held in Rasul v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush (ruling that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear detainees’ habeas petitions), Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush (ruling that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear detainees’ habeas petitions), Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush (ruling that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear detainees’ habeas petitions), Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
But the Supreme Court allowed prisoners at the base to challenge their detention in 2004 (full disclosure: I was lead counsel in that case, Rasul v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
One can describe that law with alarming simplicity: no appellate court has reached the merits of a claim challenging the Bush Administration’s RDI program. [read post]