Search for: "Ray Beckerman" Results 121 - 140 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 12:37 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-27, defendant Doe #1 has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim.Doe #1 Motion to Dismiss: Notice of Motion, Declaration, ExhibitsDoe #1 Motion to Dismiss: Memorandum of Law var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:52 am by Ray Beckerman
MP3Tunes, the plaintiffs and the individual defendant Michael Robertson have moved for reconsideration.Memorandum of Law in support of Robertson motion for reconsideration on jurisdictional issuesMemorandum of Law in support of Robertson motion for reconsideration on liability issuesMemorandum of Law in support of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:24 pm by Ray Beckerman
August 27, 2012, decision of US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:16 pm by Ray Beckerman
Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for DefendantDeclarationMemorandum of Law var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:47 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, this one pro se, and the plaintiff has filed a memorandum of law opposing the motion.Doe #1 motion to quashPlaintiff's opposition memorandum var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 7:19 am by Ray Beckerman
Plaintiff's response to Doe #5's motion to sever and quash var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45 Plaintiff's memorandum of law in opposition to motion by Doe #41 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-120, Doe number 83 has filed a motion to dismiss.Defendant Doe 83's memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:49 am by Ray Beckerman
In In re BitTorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement Cases, Magistrate Judge Gary Brown has ordered the Doe #1 defendants to show cause at a hearing why their identities should not be divulged to the plaintiffs.Notice and Order to Show Cause dated August 10, 2012 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:33 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, a second Doe has moved to quash, this one appearing pro se and filing his or her motion through the Pro Se Clerk's office.Doe #8 motion to quash var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Lawyer's ‘Vexatious' Blog Posts of Case Filings:"A lawyer who is known for defending individuals accused of peer-to-peer sharing of copyrighted works over the Internet is now on the hot seat himself.The Recording Industry Association of America is seeking sanctions against attorney Ray Beckerman in a federal court case in New York, claiming that he has engaged in "obstructionist tactics" and provided… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Raymond's employersExhibit K-Defendant's objection to Gustave Lindor motion as "fishing expedition"Exhibit L-Ray Beckerman to Hon. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Ray Beckerman
Defendant John Doe #4's Reply Memorandum of Law var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, the plaintiff has filed its papers responding to the motion to quash filed by pro se defendant Doe #8.Plaintiff's time to respond to a separate motion filed by defendant Doe #41 has not run yet.Plaintiff's memorandum of law responding to motion by defendant Doe #8 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:16 am by Ray Beckerman
Gunter, an injunction case against myVidster.com, a social bookmarking site, the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit reversed a preliminary injunction which had been granted by the district court against myVidster, holding that the site's linking to, and framing of, infringing videos hosted elsewhere, did not likely constitute either a direct or a contributory infringement of plaintiff's rights in the videos.August 2, 2012, opinion var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; … [read post]