Search for: "Ray v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am by centerforartlaw
Under the new NAGPRA regulations, one of the key innovations is the addition of specific deadlines that institutions must adhere to.[34] While museums are publicly supportive of the goals to streamline the repatriation process, some museums have argued that these timelines are unmanageable.[35] Museums have long blamed their delays in the NAGPRA repatriation process on a lack of resources.[36] Even the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) has stated that the timelines seemed… [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm by Kevin
PLEASE NOTE that I am still waiting for someone to send me a picture of the attorney who wore a Grover head during opening statements in Burns v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:07 pm by The Regulatory Review
Pierce, Jr., The George Washington University Law School United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
, (November 21, 2024).From SmartCILP:Forrest Tahdooahnippah, The "Ceremonial Use" Defense to Infringement of Psychedelic Patents, 39 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 917-960 (2024).Mike Steenson, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:36 am by jonathanturley
Hall, has dismissed Ray Epps’s defamation lawsuit. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Vacating the dismissal order is consistent with the public policy of this State to dispose of cases on their merits (Harwood v Chaliha, 291 AD2d 234, 234 [1st Dept 2002]), and upholds the principle that a trial court’s power to dismiss an action sua sponte should be used ‘sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances'” (Cooper v Broems, 214 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ray v… [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:23 am by Béligh Elbalti
[This continued to be the case until] the legislator intervened to address the issue of the jurisdiction that is exclusive to UAE courts [as the requested State] and concurrent jurisdiction that shared the foreign rendering court whose judgment is sought to be enforced [in UAE]. [read post]