Search for: "Rayner v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Regina (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
R (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 176; [2008] WLR (D) 85 “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of the case a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, whether because of the timescale envisaged or for lack of a right of direct access to a court. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am by SW
….(5)If the justices are of opinion that an application under this section is frivolous, they may refuse to state a case, and, if the applicant so requires, shall give him a certificate stating that the application has been refused; but the justices shall not refuse to state a case if the application is made by or under the direction of the Attorney General. (6)Where justices refuse to state a case, the High Court may, on the application of the person who… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm by Marcus Rayner
– Marcus Rayner, executive director of the New Jersey Lawsuit Reform Alliance, issued the following statement regarding the state Supreme Court’s decision in Kendall v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:09 am
(On the Applications of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 177 (12 March 2008) RHJ Ltd v FT Patten (Holdings) Ltd & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 151 (12 March 2008) Secretary of State for Justice v Rayner [2008] EWCA Civ 176 (12 March 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd [2008] EWHC 454 (Ch) (12 March 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:25 pm
Contents include:ArticlesMichael Douglas & Nicholas Loadsman, The Impact of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial ContractsAndrew Edgar & Rayner Thwaites, Implementing Treaties in Domestic Law: Translation, Enforcement and Administrative Law Gabrielle Holly, Transnational Tort and Access to Remedy under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Kamasee v Commonwealth David Hughes, Investigation as Legitimisation: The Development,… [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2006] EWCA Civ 1279, at para. 146, per Laws LJ).Thus, to give some examples, the exclusion of all actions in nuisance (a tort) in relation to the noise from Heathrow Airport was accepted by the ECtHR as removing the potential claimants’ ‘civil rights’ (Powell and Rayner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:07 am by Earl Drott
Lopez East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:07 am by Earl Drott
Lopez East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:01 pm
Make no mistake about it, the firing of Rayner Noble is a sad commentary on the state of intercollegiate athletics. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm by Maria Hook
The decision arose on an application to stay or dismiss the enforcement proceeding at the jurisdictional stage. [2] Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804. [3] The judge noted that the House of Lords had rejected the argument that it should not recognize the courts of the German Democratic Republic (Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner &  Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853), and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was not… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am by INFORRM
HHJ Lewis noted the Court’s discretion to award a single award in the case or two or more libels, as stated in Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers [2017] EWHC 543 (QB). [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 30 October, Nicklin J handed down judgment in Rayner v Seabourne-Hawkins [2020] EWHC 2895 (QB). [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm by Tobias Thienel
The right of access therefore does not apply (see Powell and Rayner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]