Search for: "Rea v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 2:50 pm by David Stein
United States required proof of criminal intent with the threat charges and convictions and the Court of Appeals applied the very same reasoning in requiring proof of mens rea or criminal intent before threats conviction can be sustained. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:12 am by Orin Kerr
United States, the Fourth Amendment case on whether an unauthorized driver has rights to challenge the search of a rental car. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am by Paul M. Rashkind
It then noted that in criminal law, courts typically apply the required mens rea to every element in the statute. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
This is exactly what happened in the case State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  These decisions, the Court concluded, would not be approved by the Supreme Judicial Court, the highest state court, because the two involve different mens rea requirements – intentional vs. reckless. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  These decisions, the Court concluded, would not be approved by the Supreme Judicial Court, the highest state court, because the two involve different mens rea requirements – intentional vs. reckless. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States: Federal law prohibits any person convicted of a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" from possessing a firearm. 18 U. [read post]