Search for: "Rea v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 10:17 am by Paul M. Rashkind
It then noted that in criminal law, courts typically apply the required mens rea to every element in the statute. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
This is exactly what happened in the case State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  These decisions, the Court concluded, would not be approved by the Supreme Judicial Court, the highest state court, because the two involve different mens rea requirements – intentional vs. reckless. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  These decisions, the Court concluded, would not be approved by the Supreme Judicial Court, the highest state court, because the two involve different mens rea requirements – intentional vs. reckless. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States: Federal law prohibits any person convicted of a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" from possessing a firearm. 18 U. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:11 am
On May 4, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
  Whether the Claims Sufficiently “Touch and Concern” the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Paul.In Part III, we take head-on the argument that the "crush video" case, United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:23 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller The brief says this with regard to the mens rea of aiding and abetting (knowledge) in Furundzija and Vasiljevic (pp. 10-11): Further, it may be questioned whether the mens rea discussion in these opinions was necessary to their holdings. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]