Search for: "Rea v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 10:39 am by Jack Sharman
Or, as my Lightfoot colleagues Brandon Essig, Jeff Doss and I put it in a recent article for Law 360: With the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:36 am by Ellen Podgor
United States leaving the 11th Circuit decision (Clay) on mens rea standing. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
This is exactly what happened in the case State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Rest Easy (or Easier), Low-level Computer Technicians In United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:06 pm by Bradley Shear
United States, states that mens rea or intent to harm is required in order to convict someone of social media threats. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:37 pm by John Elwood
United States; and (2) whether, under Elonis, Section 790.162, Florida Statutes, contains the necessary criminal element of mens rea or guilty knowledge instead of a mental state of mere negligence. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:37 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-5454 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm by Kate Howard
United States; and (2) whether, under Elonis, Section 790.162, Florida Statutes, contains the necessary criminal element of mens rea or guilty knowledge instead of a mental state of mere negligence. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
United States; and (2) whether, under Elonis, Section 790.162, Florida Statutes, contains the necessary criminal element of mens rea or guilty knowledge instead of a mental state of mere negligence. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:59 am by Kate Howard
United States; and (2) whether, under Elonis, Section 790.162, Florida Statutes, contains the necessary criminal element of mens rea or guilty knowledge instead of a mental state of mere negligence. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
” In the “friend” brief filed in United States v. [read post]