Search for: "Read v. People" Results 101 - 120 of 21,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Sure, the California Supreme Court is left-leaning in a lot of areas, but sometimes when reading an opinion (or otherwise), you don't need a weathervane to know which way the wind blows.Here's a test: See if you can fill in the blank for the next word in this opinion, the first paragraph of which reads (in its entirety):"A jury convicted Manuel Bracamontes of the first degree murder of nine-year-old Laura Arroyo, with special circumstances for committing the murder… [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:12 am
Indeed, for unrelated reasons, just last week I was reading several dozen cases in which the defendant did exactly what Pham did. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Government Agencies Are Not People Under AIA in Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 2:06 pm
 The trial court said:"None of these people had done anything to you. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 5:01 pm
Read this opinion (and dissent), which involves a three-strike life sentence for having five tiny bindles of heroin for a guy who's now 59 years old. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:13 pm
"  Add to that to an earlier transcription that read (as described in today's opinion):  "The People also look to Mitchell v[.] [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:47 am
 The opinion reads like a story out of a concentration camp. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
I ask this after spending quite a bit of time -- trust me, quite a bit -- reading this opinion from earlier today. [read post]