Search for: "Record v. Record"
Results 1 - 20
of 71,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 10:39 am
” City of San Jose v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:05 pm
Bennett January 16, 2008 EsNtion Records, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
We did a lengthy discussion of the Chancery Court's recent opinion in Kurz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Engel v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:19 am
Hat tip to Phil Usher and Wired.comThe United States Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Jammie Thomas's case, Capitol Records v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:36 pm
I recently looked at the case of Beardmore v Lancashire County Council where the court allowed recovery of medical agency fees (limited to £30 in addition to the direct costs) for obtaining medical records in an EL/PL Portal claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:55 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:58 am
To obtain these personnel records, the party seeking disclosure must file a written motion, colloquially referred to as a “Pitchess” motion in reference to the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Pitchess v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
Kroh v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 11:16 am
Records v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:50 am
JOHNSON V. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:06 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:04 am
In Petrocelli v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:08 am
defcon9_12_bg_071401.jpg Airline check-in and reservation computer records were admissible under the business records hearsay exception; the fact that the records were printed at the request of an INS agent did not alter the character of the business records, in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
As the Court explained,"[t]he appeal must be dismissed because no judgment or order is included in the record on appeal, and '[n]o appeal lies from a decision' (People v McCarter, 97 AD2d 852). [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2005, 5:13 am
In Microdecisions v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:42 am
Take the case of Ward v. [read post]
