Search for: "Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We further conclude that there are triable issues of fact whether the gaps in the legal services that defendants performed for the Town were "merely . . . period[s] absent expectations, rather than . . . period[s] when representation formally ended" (Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 2013 NY Slip Op 23468, affd 118 AD3d 581, 582). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP    2014 NY Slip Op 04570     Decided on June 19, 2014   Appellate Division, First Department is the latest wow legal malpractice case, since it ended in a $ 17.2 million award, and is sure to be the largest Legal Malpractice award of the year. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP  2014 NY Slip Op 04570  Decided on June 19, 2014  Appellate Division, First Department  the case ends in a verdict for $ 17.2 million. [read post]