Search for: "Reed v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 1:22 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:58 pm
City of Los Angeles revisited an earlier opinion regarding the content neutrality of ordinances in five Southern California cities that banned mobile billboard advertising. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
For example, remember the Los Angeles Carmageddon, which anticipated hugely snarled traffic? [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
City of Los Angeles, No. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:24 am
This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Reed v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
It's absurd that Los Angeles has a law that allows the city to impound a vehicle for 30 days -- a minimum of 30 days -- when it's driven by an unlicensed driver. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
Plenty wrong with that [ACSH] By 31-69 margin, Los Angeles voters crush anti-development Measure S, “NIMBYism on steroids” [City Observatory, earlier] Tackling WOTUS is just the start: “The Clean Water Act Needs A Reset” [Reed Hopper, Investors, Jonathan Wood, related] Tags: climate change, eminent domain, environment, junk science Environment roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:39 am
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court’s analysis and applied the three part standard from City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:45 pm
See POM v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:29 pm
City of Los Angeles, Nos. 14-55014, 14-55050 (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
McCurdy of Reed Smith in the firm's Health Industry Washington Watch Blog Franchise Growth Threatened Without Bailout? [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
In Reed v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
On 6 December 2019, following a four-day defamation trial at a federal court in Los Angeles, a jury has found in favour of Elon Musk, ruling that he did not defame a British caver Vernon Unsworth, who helped in last year’s rescue of trapped Thai schoolboys by calling him a “pedo guy”. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
Eichman (1990) ("Although the [statute] contains no explicit content-based limitation on the scope of prohibited conduct, it is nevertheless clear that the Government's asserted interest is related to the suppression of free expression"); Members of City Council of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:29 pm
- Los Angeles attorney Elizabeth Arce of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm's California Public Agency and Employment Blog Can I Make All My Employees Managers To Avoid Overtime Pay; and Other Myths. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:50 pm
- New Jersey lawyer Eric Solotoff of Fox Rothschild on the firm's NJ Family Legal Blog Immigration Magnetized, Privatized and Depersonalized - Los Angeles attorney Angelo Paparelli of Seyfarth Shaw on his blog, Nation of Immigrators [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
For more about this ethical duty in eminent domain cases, see, e.g., City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
Holding in Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times opines that the Court’s decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
