Search for: "Reed v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
In Reed, the Supreme Court used a simple approach. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
My friend and case-book co-editor Akhil Reed Amar believes that it is “nonsensical” to argue that there was the slightest merit to the Southern argument for secession as presented in 1860-61. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
For example, remember the Los Angeles Carmageddon, which anticipated hugely snarled traffic? [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
Holding in Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
Eichman (1990) ("Although the [statute] contains no explicit content-based limitation on the scope of prohibited conduct, it is nevertheless clear that the Government's asserted interest is related to the suppression of free expression"); Members of City Council of Los Angeles v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
City of Oklahoma City, 572 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:22 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Louis to Los Angeles in 2016. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
Jay J then heard an application in the case of Wright v Granath before Jay J. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
On 6 December 2019, following a four-day defamation trial at a federal court in Los Angeles, a jury has found in favour of Elon Musk, ruling that he did not defame a British caver Vernon Unsworth, who helped in last year’s rescue of trapped Thai schoolboys by calling him a “pedo guy”. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
City of New London both indicate that the “for public use” portion of the Takings Clause restricts condemnations further than normal due process limits on state police power. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
It's absurd that Los Angeles has a law that allows the city to impound a vehicle for 30 days -- a minimum of 30 days -- when it's driven by an unlicensed driver. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:39 am
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court’s analysis and applied the three part standard from City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
Plenty wrong with that [ACSH] By 31-69 margin, Los Angeles voters crush anti-development Measure S, “NIMBYism on steroids” [City Observatory, earlier] Tackling WOTUS is just the start: “The Clean Water Act Needs A Reset” [Reed Hopper, Investors, Jonathan Wood, related] Tags: climate change, eminent domain, environment, junk science Environment roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:29 pm
City of Los Angeles, Nos. 14-55014, 14-55050 (9th Cir. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:58 pm
City of Los Angeles revisited an earlier opinion regarding the content neutrality of ordinances in five Southern California cities that banned mobile billboard advertising. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
In Reed v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:24 am
This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]