Search for: "Reed v. High" Results 21 - 40 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
I expect some courts will say there’s no censorship if any one of the elements discussed above is missing, essentially turning this case into a high bar that few other cases will reach. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
The Foundation submitted an amicus brief in support of EPA in Mass. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:15 am
"The high demands on partners in global law firms to increase profits, the client said, ultimately led to its claims of professional negligence against Reed Smith. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:15 am
"The high demands on partners in global law firms to increase profits, the client said, ultimately led to its claims of professional negligence against Reed Smith. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Malfitano, Penn Record/Forbes, earlier on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court’s sleeper case of the term, Reed v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
In cases like this, not to mention Reed v Reed and Pitman v Nominet, Merpel would like to see the party initiating the proceedings take some sort of sanity check, and/or be made to issue a statement to shareholders, explaining what it was trying to do, and why. [read post]
Significance of this decision The decision in Goh overrules the sentencing framework set out in the previous High Court decision of Takaaki Masui v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am by Jonathan Glasson QC
Damages for recovery of the costs of surrogacy On 1 April 2020, Lord Reed announced by video link the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14, on appeal from [2018] EWCA Civ 2832. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:47 am
.: CL12000440-00 in Circuit Court for Gloucester County, Virginia, captioned Patrick Lee Cherrie, Administrator of the Estate of Gerda A Harvey, Deceased, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:20 pm
  A lot.The strong sense I got from reading the opinion is that Judge Reed was either doing a quick-and-dirty (or sloppy) job resolving the case or, perhaps more likely, had such a strong distaste for the plantiffs' claims that he wanted them out of court -- any court -- come hell or high water, doctrine be damned. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
On Monday and Tuesday, the 3 and 4 December 2018, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear Privacy International’s appeal (UKSC 2018/0004) against the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2017] EWCA Civ 1868; [2018] 1 WLR 2572), which found that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA 2000”), s 67(8)… [read post]