Search for: "Reed v. High" Results 61 - 80 of 640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 10:42 am by L. Gopika
It also came to the knowledge of Pearson that titles listed under their agreement with Sanguine was being published by another publishing house, namely, Reed Elsevier India Private Limited. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm by Daithí
  Indeed, the framework of high/low value could be capable of application in a variety of other contexts. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Plenty wrong with that [ACSH] By 31-69 margin, Los Angeles voters crush anti-development Measure S, “NIMBYism on steroids” [City Observatory, earlier] Tackling WOTUS is just the start: “The Clean Water Act Needs A Reset” [Reed Hopper, Investors, Jonathan Wood, related] Tags: climate change, eminent domain, environment, junk science Environment roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:41 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Comparison with Holland v HM Advocate [2005] UKPC D 1 does not assist, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was performing a different exercise and its decision reflected the particular circumstances of that appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent post-Tincher decision in the case of High v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
Louisiana and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals heard another Texas case with deep racial undertones, that of Rodney Reed. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Patrick Yingling of Reed Smith on Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
” [63] (Lord Neuberger and Lord Judge: Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Kerr and Reed agreed) The decision of the Divisional Court Now the appeal in Beghal brings the issue squarely before the Court. [read post]