Search for: "Reed v. High"
Results 101 - 120
of 659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
Reed, No. 09-559. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm
“An Innovative Way to Title Property in Poor Countries” [Ian Vasquez on Peter Schaefer and Clay Schaefer Cato study] Berman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
In Lillie & Reed v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600, following a 6 month trial, he found two nursery workers, Dawn Reed and Christopher Lillie had been libelled in a Report commissioned by the Council which accused them of wide-scale sexual abuse of pre-school children. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:36 am
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal had rejected her claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:50 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:26 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge adopted a formulation that the Creditor [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:20 am
Following an appeal heard on 5 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down judgment on 13 July in the case of Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm
Most high profile was that in which the Court partially overturned the decision of Tugendhat J in Cruddas v Calvert. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Their free speech rights rest on a very thin reed at this point. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
Coming this Thursday, June 11: Cato conference marks tenth anniversary of eminent domain/property rights case Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:30 pm
The trial of Perry v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 9:01 am
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 2:59 am
Chamber, earlier] Tags: Argentina, endangered species, land use and zoning, Los Angeles, music and musicians Environment roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
”The Idaho Press Tribune recently ran a story on the federal judge who decided Reed v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
The Inner House found that the finding of 90% was too high and reduced it to 70%. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
